Connect with us

Casino & Slots

BET365 POUNCES ON CHEEKY BULGARIAN OUTFIT BETIO FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

Staying Legit

BET365 POUNCES ON CHEEKY BULGARIAN OUTFIT BETIO FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

Published

on





British betting behemoth Bet365 is suing Bulgarian white label sports betting tech provider Betio after they rocked up at ICE with ‘similar’ branding.

Apparently Bet365, the UK-based betting behemoth is launching legal action against Bulgarian white label sports betting tech provider Betio.

Calvin Ayre reports that Bet365 is suing the Bulgarian outfit for intellectual property infringement. It seems the whole drama started when Betio rocked up at ICE London last week with a product and branding that looked, well, ‘more than a little similar’ to Bet365’s well-known colour scheme, layout and design format.

The reports say that, unsurprisingly, several attendees noticed Betio’s cheeky attempt to ride on Bet365’s hard-earned reputation, and the British company decided action must be taken.

Bet365 is no stranger to the Bulgarian market, having been a licensed operator there since 2016, and it seems inconceivable that the management and design team at Betio didn’t know they were creating something so similar to Bet365.

What is most shocking perhaps, is that they actually thought they could get away with using the branding in question so brazenly at the industry’s biggest convention, on Bet365’s home turf! With Bet365 having more financial resources than some small countries (see BET365 POSTS £2.45BN PROFIT AS COATES NAMED UK’S HIGHEST PAID BOSS), things don’t look good for Betio.

Surprisingly, a look at the Betio website shows that the company is still using the ‘Bet365esque’ branding on its products, suggesting they either don’t take the news seriously, or they intend to fight their corner.

Whatever happens with this specific case, it does draw attention to an issue AYO.NEWS has pointed out before – that companies from eastern Europe and other regions may run into issues when they try to enter western Europe and, especially, North America, where attitudes to copyright and intellectual property are often different, and companies tend to be more willing to launch legal action.

Whilst we’re looking east, there are signs that Bet365 is hoping to become the second western operator to get a Russian license (after GVC Holding’s Bwin brand which partnered with local companies Digital Betting LLC and Rambler & CO). A Russian affiliate site claims to have been informed of Bet365’s Russian intentions during a conversation with a company official, and Bet365 has been advertising for Russian-speaking customer service staff.

iGaming

188BET WITHDRAWS FROM BRITISH AND IRISH MARKETS WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT

Published

on

Isle of Man-based online gambling operator 188Bet withdraws from British and Irish markets with immediate effect, though company says it is solvent.

This morning Isle of Man-based online gambling operator 188Bet ceased offering services to players in Great Britain, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands, Gibraltar and Ireland.

According to Annatar Limited, the owner of 188Bet, the decision to cease operations was a commercial one taken in light of a very competitive market, and it was stressed that the company is solvent and will meet its financial obligations.

Information has been posted on the 188Bet site advising customers of what to do, and letting them know that they will be able to log in and withdraw their funds until 23:59 (GMT) on 30th August 2019.

The operator has said all pending bets for events up to 23:59 on 20th June will be honoured, but single bets for events after that will be voided and stakes returned. Likewise, multiple bets for events up that date will be settled normally, but wages with winning multiple selections as of 23:59 on 30th June, that still have unsettled specifications for events after that date, will have those specifications voided and the bet settled within 48 hours.

188Bet has been no stranger to controversy, making the headlines for offering live bets on academy games that featured players as young as 14 – though the company insisted this was to cater for its large customer base in Asia.

The brand has been closely involved with English football, at times being the official gambling partner of both Chelsea FC and Aston Villa FC, and shirt sponsor of Bolton Wanderers and Wigan Athletic.

AYO.NEWS says:

The news that 188Bet has decided its no longer worth catering for the markets covered by the UKGC and ASA is hardly surprising, given the increasingly draconian nature of their rules which are turning marketing and advertising in those markets into a high risk minefield. It wouldn’t be surprising to see more operators follow the same course in the next few months, as they decide to concentrate on higher-growth, less regulation-heavy markets around the world.

Continue Reading

Sports Betting

NBA STAR LEBRON JAMES IN HOT WATER AFTER RE-TWEETING MYBOOKIE VIDEO

Published

on

NBA superstar LeBron James breaks organisation’s rules by re-tweeting video from Curacao-licensed sportsbook MyBookie.

Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James is in hot water after promoting a tweet from Curacao-licensed online bookmaker MyBookie over the weekend.

The video in question featured MLB team Los Angeles Angels’ baseball player Mike Trout, who just signed a record 12-year contract worth $426.5m with the team, stepping up to the plate.

 

Though it is not known if James received any payment for the re-tweet, or if he just did it without thinking, the post got more than 7,000 re-tweets and almost 56,000 likes, making it potentially valuable marketing for the bookies.

The problem is that, although the NBA itself and teams can enter partnerships with gambling companies subject to certain restrictions, under current rules which the NBA have been keen to stress this year, it is strictly prohibited for players to engage in this kind of promotional activity with gambling operators.

As Manging Editor of LegalSportsReport.com and PlayNJ.com, Dustin Gouker, summed up in a tweet “January: NBA reinforcing gambling policy. Great! March: Biggest star in the game re-tweeting MyBookie.”

 

AYO.NEWS says:

Even if LeBron didn’t receive payment, and simply wasn’t thinking when he re-tweeted MyBookie, the event illustrates the urgent need for the NBA (and other American leagues and sporting organisations) to educate their players, athletes and staff regarding what is and isn’t appropriate in terms of endorsements and marketing.

The world of social media marketing is particularly murky, with blurry boundaries between marketing and personal engagement. We’ve seen the same problem with social media influencers who were plugging products and not even realising they were engaged in marketing.

One things for sure, MyBookie’s marketing department will be patting themselves on the back this week!  

Continue Reading

iGaming

SWEDISH REGULATOR HITS GENESIS & PAF WITH FINES FOR SELF-EXCLUSION FAILINGS

Published

on

By

Swedish gaming regulator hits Genesis Global Limited and Paf Consulting Corporation with fines for failing to implement self-exclusion registry.

The Swedish gaming regulator, Spelinspektionen, has slapped Malta-based Genesis Global Limited and Finland-based Paf Consulting Corporation with fines for failing to implement the self-exclusion registry.

Under the country’s new gaming act, which came into force on 1st January 2019, all Swedish-licensed gaming companies are required to join the self-exclusion registry. However, in the days following the launch of the new gaming regime, the Gaming Inspector was contacted by self-excluded players who were still able to bet at sites run by the companies.

In response to the failings, Genesis has been issued with formal warning and a fine of SEK 4,000,000 (approx. €383,000) and Paf warning and a fine of SEK 100,000 (approx. €9,500).

Genesis provides games for sites including casinocruise.com, casinogods.com, casinojoy.com, pelaa.com, sloty.com, spel.com, spinit.com, and vegashero.com. While Paf has games on paf.com and paf.se.

AYO.NEWS says:

It seems very unlikely that Genesis and Paf would have deliberately flouted the self-exclusion policy, given how well-publicised the rules were in good time prior to the introduction of the new gaming act. Considering that the plethora of other operators managed to abide by the rules from the get go, it can only be assumed that there were internal systems failures.

 

Continue Reading

Trending


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *