Revolut founder and CEO Nik Storonsky hits back at UK media coverage suggesting digital banking app suffered AML failings.
Revolut founder and CEO, Nik Storonsky, has hit back at UK media coverage suggesting that the digital banking app was in some kind of hot water regarding allegations of a money laundering breach and negligence.
British media reports make damaging allegations
In a blog post, Storonsky, vigorously denied that the company had experienced and AML failings, and stressed that the resignation of Revolut Chief Financial Officer Peter O’Higgins was in no way related to any alleged failings.
Recently some UK media reports claimed that Revolut was under investigation, with Tim Cook writing in the Telegraph on 1st March that “The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking answers from Revolut, the UK’s fastest growing digital bank, amid questions over its compliance procedures” and boasting that the Telegraph had earlier revealed that the “system used by the London-based startup to prevent money laundering and other illegal activity was switched off.”
No compliance failures, a new system was just being tested
However, Storonsky clarified that, in actuality, in July 2018 Revolut had rolled out a “more advanced screening system” alongside their existing controls. This was meant as an additional layer of AML screening, and the existing systems already met all regulatory compliance standards. It was this additional system that was later turned off.
According to Storonsky the new system was turned off because it was flagging too many false positives, as he explained:
“During the initial testing stage of these new systems, we decided that they were not calibrated to a standard that we would expect, so we therefore decided to temporarily revert to our existing controls, while we continued to enhance the new systems. In our view, the new systems were imprecise and were resulting in too many false positive cases, which in turn resulted in an increase in customer dissatisfaction.”
He went on to emphasise at no point did the company fail to meet its legal or regulatory requirements, and that a thorough investigation had confirmed there had been no breach, and as such, quite properly, no notice had been sent to the regulator.
The sad state of UK mainstream media
Taking a swipe at UK mainstream media, he added:
“Unfortunately, this fact was not included in the original news story.”
Referring to the departure of O’Higgins, Storonsky explained that the former CFO had decided to step aside to let someone with more experience in global retail banking take over, given the fact that Revolut is preparing applications to become a licensed bank in multiple jurisdictions, adding:
“Any suggestion that Peter’s resignation is in any way, shape or form connected to this roll-out is utterly false and damaging. Peter has since expressed to me that he has been hurt by this suggestion and sad that his departure has been tainted in this way.”
You can read Storonsky’s full blog post here.
AYO.NEWS says:
As we have highlighted many times, the standard of reporting in many mainstream UK media organisations leaves a lot to be desired these days, and the situation seems to be getting worse. Biased, ill-informed reporting, shockingly bad research and sensationalism masquerading as serious journalism is damaging a both legitimate businesses and individuals.
From the entire Brexit debacle to the scapegoating of the gambling industry, and now unfounded accusations and mud slinging at the digital banking sector, the UK’s media is in a sorry state.
Leave a Reply