Sponsored content:
The Norwegian gambling law is ambiguous and leaves plenty of room for uncertainty.
As is the case in many countries, gambling is overseen by a government run monopoly, where Norsk Tipping and Norsk Rikstoto are the two main companies permitted to take wagers from Norwegian players.
Although that doesn’t stop Norwegians gambling on internationally licensed sites, far from it in fact. Despite the government’s attempt to block transactions and IPs of unlicensed casinos there are still several online casinos to choose from for any potential Norwegian player.
In reality it simply represents a mass of funds that aren’t collected as tax in Norway, but instead leave the country’s borders, lining the pockets of international operators.
Winner and losers
At present it’s the players that are the losers in this situation. Norwegians play on international gambling sites and the authorities are actually working against them as they seek to block transactions, causing more harm rather than protecting the players.
Responsible gambling shouldn’t be taken light heartedly, and a regulated market could solve many of the existing issues in that particular area. With clear laws in place for anyone offering their services in Norway, as in their neighbouring countries, player protection would be made easier to oversee.
The larger international gambling operators are already engaged in several markets where this is a reality, and have proven time and again their ability to adapt their services to alternative markets. There stands no reason why Norway would be any different.
On the other hand, from a social welfare perspective it’s easy to see how the existing monopoly might be the best option if the government manages to ensure unregulated operators remain a non-viable option. Something they have failed at so far.
Room for both
We have however seen some compromises in other countries, allowing room for both state owned and private businesses to operate concurrently. For Norway though, the most logical point of departure is to look toward their neighbours, Sweden and Denmark, to get a feel of how this could possibly pan out.
Denmark regulated their market back in 2012 and Sweden followed suit in 2019. So far, this has shown that both private and state run gambling companies can exist in harmony. In Sweden for example, between January and October 2019, close to $300 million was paid in taxes on gambling. It’s safe to say then that there are many benefits to deregulating the market to allow room for operators outside if a country monopoly.
What can be done?
It’s no secret that we, as humans, are moving towards a more digitalised world. It’s probable that the gaming monopolies’ offline revenues are increasingly likely to decrease year on year.
With online competition becoming increasingly tougher it’s fair to say that international operators are likely to take a large portion of money wagered online against state run monopoly enterprises.
If the Norwegian government does seek to regulate the gambling market and allow other players to enter the field Norwegian authorities could be set to reap millions in tax revenue.
It’s no surprise that betting and casino companies want to see an overhaul of the current , seeking to be a benefit to Norwegian players and lead to an increase in tax income for the state.